It's my blog, has just a welcome message and it gets targeted. And why don't Microsoft mind their own business and let people decide for themselves which sites they visit. Give a warning, maybe, block every page on a site or make it difficult to access NO. Is this all part of them wanting to take over the net, just look at the data sent from Windows If issue persists, try to open the website in InPrivate Browsing and see if it helps.
To open website in InPrivate browsing you may refer to the steps provided below. It might be helpful if a number of users report the site as safe. I've searched previously for a way to report this directly, not through the warning page, but not found a way. Ask friends to report the site as safe or put a note on the Blog asking any visitors who get the warning to report the site as safe.
You can immediately submit a request for a correction. SmartScreen Filter provides a web-based feedback system for customers and website owners to report potential false warnings or blocks as quickly as possible. From a red warning, click Report that this site does not contain threats. This will take you to a feedback page where you can indicate you are a site owner or representative. Follow the instructions and provide the information to submit a website for review.
Threats include any threat of suicide, violence, or harm to another. Any content of an adult theme or inappropriate to a community web site. Any image, link, or discussion of nudity. Any behavior that is insulting, rude, vulgar, desecrating, or showing disrespect. Any behavior that appears to violate End user license agreements, including providing product keys or links to pirated software. Unsolicited bulk mail or bulk advertising. CC licensed , but you must confirm the status of any material you hope to reuse.
Similar concerns apply when uploading material to the Internet. It might be perfectly acceptable under the Fair Use doctrine to include graphs from various articles in a paper written for class; it is probably not a fair use, however, to publish those graphs to the world by posting the same paper on the Internet. Skip to main content. Therefore collaboration between these two departments is essential to ensure that a comprehensive internet usage policy is formulated according to the needs of the company and then enforced.
The scope of an internet usage policy is not to snoop on employees or deny them all access rights to the internet whilst at work; however, guidelines and rules need to be formulated to protect employees from being subjected to material that may be inappropriate to a work environment and that could result in legal ramifications. An internet usage policy also aims to educate users about web-borne threats and how irresponsible browsing can result in malicious packages being unknowingly downloaded onto a computer which in turn could infect the whole network.
Therefore a training session about internet security will act as a cohesive link with the internet usage policy and will likely result in users abiding by the policy once they understand the reasoning behind it. A clear distinction needs to be made between work use and personal use. The use of the internet at work offers many advantages and resources which can be beneficial to a company's operations. The problems arise with allowed access to personal email accounts, social networking sites, auction sites, etc.
This is just one of many security issues resulting from unmonitored internet browsing. Downloading software or attachments onto a work computer increases the risk of a virus infection throughout the network.
Employees need to be warned about the dangers that downloading unknown files can present. Not all internet usage policies are the same, as they should be tailor-made to the needs and structure of the company; so certain companies might accept that these sites can be used during breaks.
Banning the access to these sites could be seen as draconian and result in disgruntled employees who feel that they aren't trusted. Time-controlled access to sites that don't pose any ethical or moral problems is likely to be the better option as this would suit both users and policy-makers, although most companies would choose to block instant messaging sites like MSN Messenger because these are seen as time-wasters and facilitate downloads and uploads with little supervision. Ultimately there needs to be a balance so as to maintain good relations between staff and management.
However, employees must be made aware that their internet access at work is a privilege and not a right and that they are expected to abide by the acceptable use policies put in place by management as employees of the company. Penalties for improper internet usage could start with a verbal warning, increase to a written reprimand, demotion and eventual work termination.
Employees must realise that their internet browsing has consequences and if they ignore the policy then they must bear the consequences. For help on creating an internet usage policy for your organization, please refer to this sample internet usage policy.
0コメント